YES

Solver Timeout: 4
Global Timeout: 300
Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900
*******************************************************************************************
*********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION ***********************
*******************************************************************************************


List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+                                                                  +
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l1, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0, main_x -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_y -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_res -> 0}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l5, not((main_y > 0))>
<l2, l3, (main_y > 0)>
<l3, l4, true, seq{main_z -> main_x, main_x -> (main_y - 1), main_y -> main_z, main_res -> (main_res + 1)}>
<l4, l2, true>
<l5, l6, true, seq{main_res -> (main_res + main_x), main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:

Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+ Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l7, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>
<l7, l8, true, seq{varCall_1 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l8, l9, true, seq{main_x -> varCall_1}>
<l9, l10, true, seq{varCall_2 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l10, l1, true, seq{main_y -> varCall_2, main_res -> 0}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l3, (main_y > 0)>
<l2, l5, not((main_y > 0))>
<l3, l4, true, seq{main_z -> main_x, main_x -> (main_y - 1), main_y -> main_z, main_res -> (main_res + 1)}>
<l4, l2, true>
<l5, l6, true, seq{main_res -> (main_res + main_x), main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
6, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+                                                                  +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Function Return and Parameters Information [2 functions]:
    function name: __VERIFIER_nondet_int [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: __VERIFIER_nondet_int
        __VERIFIER_nondet_int__func_return_      [function result] : int
    function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: main
        main__func_return_      [function result] : int


AST Ident Scanner Information [6 idents]:
__VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 3, col: 1> | <line: 10, col: 9> <line: 11, col: 9>
main | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 5, col: 1>
x | local variable | integer | <line: 6, col: 5> | <line: 10, col: 5> <line: 15, col: 13> <line: 16, col: 9> <line: 21, col: 17>
y | local variable | integer | <line: 7, col: 5> | <line: 11, col: 5> <line: 14, col: 12> <line: 16, col: 13> <line: 17, col: 9>
z | local variable | integer | <line: 8, col: 5> | <line: 15, col: 9> <line: 17, col: 13>
res | local variable | integer | <line: 9, col: 5> | <line: 12, col: 5> <line: 18, col: 9> <line: 18, col: 15> <line: 21, col: 5> <line: 21, col: 11>

Main function: main
Preprocessed LLVMGraph
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l2, (main_x = undef3) /\ (main_y = undef4) /\ (main_res = 0)>
<l2, l2, (main_y > 0), par{main_x -> (main_y - 1), main_y -> main_x, main_res -> (main_res + 1)}>
<l2, l6, not((main_y > 0)), par{main_res -> (main_res + main_x)}>

Fresh variables:
undef3, undef4, 

Undef variables:
undef3, undef4, 

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
6, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

*************************************************************
*******************************************************************************************
***********************       WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG)       ***********************
*******************************************************************************************

Init Location: 0
Graph 0:
Transitions:
Variables:

Graph 1:
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_x, main_y, main_res

Graph 2:
Transitions:
Variables:

Precedence: 
Graph 0

Graph 1
<l0, l2, main_x = undef3 /\ main_y = undef4 /\ main_res = 0, {all remain the same}>

Graph 2
<l2, l6, main_y <= 0, {main_res -> main_x + main_res, rest remain the same}>

Map Locations to Subgraph:
( 0 , 0 )
( 2 , 1 )
( 6 , 2 )

*******************************************************************************************
********************************    CHECKING ASSERTIONS    ********************************
*******************************************************************************************

Proving termination of subgraph 0
Proving termination of subgraph 1
Checking unfeasibility...
Time used: 0.002175

Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000407s

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001186s
[23486 : 23488]
[23486 : 23489]
Successful child: 23488
[ Invariant Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
[ Termination Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
New Graphs: 

LOG: CALL check - Post:main_y <= main_res - Process 1
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, main_x = undef3 /\ main_y = undef4 /\ main_res = 0, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : main_y <= main_res

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000249s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000292s
INVARIANTS: 
2: 
Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
2: main_y <= main_res , main_res <= 0 , 
Narrowing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>

LOG: Narrow transition size 2
invGraph after Narrowing: 
Transitions:
<l2, l2, main_y <= main_res /\ 1 <= main_y /\ 1 <= main_res, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y /\ 1 + main_res <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_x, main_y, main_res
Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000540s

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002644s
[23486 : 23493]
[23486 : 23494]
Successful child: 23493
[ Invariant Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, main_y <= main_res /\ 1 <= main_y /\ 1 <= main_res /\ 0 <= 752 + main_x, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y /\ 1 + main_res <= main_y /\ 0 <= 752 + main_x, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
[ Termination Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, main_y <= main_res /\ 1 <= main_y /\ 1 <= main_res /\ 0 <= 752 + main_x, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y /\ 1 + main_res <= main_y /\ 0 <= 752 + main_x, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
Ranking function: 751 + main_x + main_y - main_res
New Graphs: 
Transitions:
<l2, l2, main_y <= main_res /\ 1 <= main_y /\ 1 <= main_res /\ 0 <= 752 + main_x, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_x, main_y, main_res
Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000528s
Ranking function: 751 + main_x + main_y
New Graphs: 

LOG: CALL check - Post:0 <= 752 + main_x - Process 2
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, 1 + main_res <= main_y /\ main_x = undef3 /\ main_y = undef4 /\ main_res = 0, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : 0 <= 752 + main_x

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000318s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000360s
INVARIANTS: 
2: 
Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
2: 0 <= 752 + main_x , 
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, main_y <= main_res /\ 1 <= main_y /\ 1 <= main_res, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_y /\ 1 + main_res <= main_y, {main_x -> -1 + main_y, main_y -> main_x, main_res -> 1 + main_res, rest remain the same}>
invGraph after Narrowing: 
Transitions:
Variables:
main_x, main_y, main_res
Analyzing SCC {l2}...
No cycles found.

Proving termination of subgraph 2
Analyzing SCC {l6}...
No cycles found.

Program Terminates