YES

Solver Timeout: 4
Global Timeout: 300
Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900
*******************************************************************************************
*********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION ***********************
*******************************************************************************************


List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+                                                                  +
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l1, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0, main_q -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_z -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l5, not((main_q > 0))>
<l2, l3, (main_q > 0)>
<l3, l4, true, seq{main_q -> ((main_q + main_z) - 1), main_z -> ~(main_z)}>
<l4, l2, true>
<l5, l6, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:

Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+ Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l7, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>
<l7, l8, true, seq{varCall_1 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l8, l9, true, seq{main_q -> varCall_1}>
<l9, l10, true, seq{varCall_2 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l10, l1, true, seq{main_z -> varCall_2}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l3, (main_q > 0)>
<l2, l5, not((main_q > 0))>
<l3, l4, true, seq{main_q -> ((main_q + main_z) - 1), main_z -> ~(main_z)}>
<l4, l2, true>
<l5, l6, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
6, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+                                                                  +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Function Return and Parameters Information [2 functions]:
    function name: __VERIFIER_nondet_int [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: __VERIFIER_nondet_int
        __VERIFIER_nondet_int__func_return_      [function result] : int
    function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: main
        main__func_return_      [function result] : int


AST Ident Scanner Information [4 idents]:
__VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 18, col: 1> | <line: 22, col: 6> <line: 23, col: 6>
main | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 20, col: 1>
q | local variable | integer | <line: 21, col: 5> | <line: 22, col: 2> <line: 24, col: 9> <line: 25, col: 3> <line: 25, col: 7>
z | local variable | integer | <line: 21, col: 5> | <line: 23, col: 2> <line: 25, col: 11> <line: 26, col: 3> <line: 26, col: 8>

Main function: main
Preprocessed LLVMGraph
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l2, (main_q = undef3) /\ (main_z = undef4)>
<l2, l2, (main_q > 0), par{main_q -> ((main_q + main_z) - 1), main_z -> ~(main_z)}>
<l2, l6, not((main_q > 0))>

Fresh variables:
undef3, undef4, 

Undef variables:
undef3, undef4, 

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
6, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

*************************************************************
*******************************************************************************************
***********************       WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG)       ***********************
*******************************************************************************************

Init Location: 0
Graph 0:
Transitions:
Variables:

Graph 1:
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_q, main_z

Graph 2:
Transitions:
Variables:

Precedence: 
Graph 0

Graph 1
<l0, l2, main_q = undef3 /\ main_z = undef4, {all remain the same}>

Graph 2
<l2, l6, main_q <= 0, {all remain the same}>

Map Locations to Subgraph:
( 0 , 0 )
( 2 , 1 )
( 6 , 2 )

*******************************************************************************************
********************************    CHECKING ASSERTIONS    ********************************
*******************************************************************************************

Proving termination of subgraph 0
Proving termination of subgraph 1
Checking unfeasibility...
Time used: 0.001835

Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000344s

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000983s
[7343 : 7345]
[7343 : 7346]
Successful child: 7345
[ Invariant Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
[ Termination Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...
> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
New Graphs: 

LOG: CALL check - Post:1 + main_q <= 0 - Process 1
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, main_q = undef3 /\ main_z = undef4, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : 1 + main_q <= 0

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000337s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000391s
INVARIANTS: 
2: 
Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
2: 1 + main_q <= 0 , 
Narrowing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>

LOG: Narrow transition size 1
invGraph after Narrowing: 
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_q, main_z
Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000361s

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001176s
[7343 : 7350]
[7343 : 7351]
Successful child: 7350
[ Invariant Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
[ Termination Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...
> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
New Graphs: 

LOG: CALL check - Post:main_q <= 0 - Process 2
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, 0 <= main_q /\ main_q = undef3 /\ main_z = undef4, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : main_q <= 0

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000393s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000450s
INVARIANTS: 
2: 
Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
2: main_q <= 0 , 
Narrowing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>

LOG: Narrow transition size 1
invGraph after Narrowing: 
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
Variables:
main_q, main_z
Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000357s

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001164s
[7343 : 7355]
[7343 : 7356]
Successful child: 7355
[ Invariant Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q /\ 0 <= 973 + main_q + main_z, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
[ Termination Graph ]
Strengthening and disabling transitions...

LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility

LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
Strengthening transition (result): 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q /\ 0 <= 973 + main_q + main_z, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
Ranking function: 972 + 2*main_q + main_z
New Graphs: 

LOG: CALL check - Post:0 <= 973 + main_q + main_z - Process 3
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, 1 <= main_q /\ main_q = undef3 /\ main_z = undef4, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : 0 <= 973 + main_q + main_z

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000276s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000321s
INVARIANTS: 
2: 
Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
2: 0 <= 973 + main_q + main_z , 
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 1 <= main_q, {main_q -> -1 + main_q + main_z, main_z -> -main_z, rest remain the same}>
invGraph after Narrowing: 
Transitions:
Variables:
main_q, main_z
Analyzing SCC {l2}...
No cycles found.

Proving termination of subgraph 2
Analyzing SCC {l6}...
No cycles found.

Program Terminates