NO

Solver Timeout: 4
Global Timeout: 300
Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900
*******************************************************************************************
*********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION ***********************
*******************************************************************************************


List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+                                                                  +
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l1, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0, main_i -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l7, not((main_i > 5))>
<l2, l3, (main_i > 5)>
<l3, l4, (main_i < 10)>
<l3, l6, not((main_i < 10))>
<l4, l5, true, seq{main_i -> (main_i - 1)}>
<l5, l6, true>
<l6, l2, true>
<l7, l8, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:

Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+ Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
+ After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l9, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>
<l9, l10, true, seq{varCall_1 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}>
<l10, l1, true, seq{main_i -> varCall_1}>
<l1, l2, true>
<l2, l3, (main_i > 5)>
<l2, l7, not((main_i > 5))>
<l3, l4, (main_i < 10)>
<l3, l6, not((main_i < 10))>
<l4, l5, true, seq{main_i -> (main_i - 1)}>
<l5, l6, true>
<l6, l2, true>
<l7, l8, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>

Fresh variables:

Undef variables:

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
8, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

+                                                                  +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Function Return and Parameters Information [2 functions]:
    function name: __VERIFIER_nondet_int [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: __VERIFIER_nondet_int
        __VERIFIER_nondet_int__func_return_      [function result] : int
    function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: main
        main__func_return_      [function result] : int


AST Ident Scanner Information [3 idents]:
__VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 3, col: 1> | <line: 7, col: 9>
main | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 5, col: 1>
i | local variable | integer | <line: 6, col: 5> | <line: 7, col: 5> <line: 9, col: 12> <line: 10, col: 13> <line: 11, col: 13> <line: 11, col: 17>

Main function: main
Preprocessed LLVMGraph
Init Location: 0
Transitions:
<l0, l2, (main_i = undef2)>
<l2, l2, (main_i > 5) /\ (main_i < 10), par{main_i -> (main_i - 1)}>
<l2, l2, (main_i > 5) /\ not((main_i < 10))>
<l2, l8, not((main_i > 5))>

Fresh variables:
undef2, 

Undef variables:
undef2, 

Abstraction variables:

Exit nodes:
8, 
Accepting locations:

Asserts:

*************************************************************
*******************************************************************************************
***********************       WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG)       ***********************
*******************************************************************************************

Init Location: 0
Graph 0:
Transitions:
Variables:

Graph 1:
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 6 <= main_i /\ main_i <= 9, {main_i -> -1 + main_i, rest remain the same}>
<l2, l2, 10 <= main_i, {all remain the same}>
Variables:
main_i

Graph 2:
Transitions:
Variables:

Precedence: 
Graph 0

Graph 1
<l0, l2, main_i = undef2, {all remain the same}>

Graph 2
<l2, l8, main_i <= 5, {all remain the same}>

Map Locations to Subgraph:
( 0 , 0 )
( 2 , 1 )
( 8 , 2 )

*******************************************************************************************
********************************    CHECKING ASSERTIONS    ********************************
*******************************************************************************************

Proving termination of subgraph 0
Proving termination of subgraph 1
Checking unfeasibility...
Time used: 0.002149

Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000607s
Ranking function: -6 + main_i
New Graphs: 
Transitions:
<l2, l2, 10 <= main_i, {all remain the same}>
Variables:
main_i
> No variable changes in termination graph.
Checking conditional unfeasibility...
Calling Safety with literal main_i <= 9 and entry <l2, l2, true, {all remain the same}>

LOG: CALL check - Post:main_i <= 9 - Process 1
* Exit transition: <l2, l2, true, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : main_i <= 9
Quasi-invariants: 
Location 2: main_i <= 9 ; 

LOG: CALL check - Post:main_i <= 9 - Process 2
* Exit transition: <l0, l2, main_i = undef2, {all remain the same}>
* Postcondition  : main_i <= 9

LOG: CALL solveLinear

LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000204s
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000242s

LOG: NarrowEntry size 1
It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
<l2, l2, 6 <= main_i /\ main_i <= 9, {main_i -> -1 + main_i, rest remain the same}>
Narrowing transition: 
<l2, l2, 10 <= main_i, {all remain the same}>

LOG: Narrow transition size 1
ENTRIES:
<l0, l2, 10 <= main_i /\ main_i = undef2, {all remain the same}>
END ENTRIES:
GRAPH:
<l2, l2, 10 <= main_i, {all remain the same}>
END GRAPH:
EXIT: <l2, l2, true, {all remain the same}>
POST: main_i <= 9


LOG: Try proving POST
[997 : 999]
[997 : 1000]
[997 : 1001]

LOG: Postcondition is not implied - no solution
> Postcondition is not implied!

LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 4.114325s

[997 : 1002]
[997 : 1006]
Successful child: 1002

Program does NOT terminate